On 10/29/2009 06:02 PM, Phillip Jones wrote: > NoOp wrote: >> On 10/29/2009 05:25 AM, Phillip Jones wrote: >>> Steve Wendt wrote: >>>> On 10/28/09 10:26 am, Phillip Jones wrote: >>>> >>>>>>> Java-script. Must not be too dangerous Adobe acrobat uses it >>>>>>> extensively. >>>>>> >>>>>> Acrobat also has a lot of security exploits (!). >>>>> >>>>> But related not to Java-script. >>>> >>>> A quick Google search suggests otherwise: >>>> http://www.404techsupport.com/2009/02/20/prevent-the-latest-exploit-in-adobe-acrobat-disable-javascript/ >>>> http://www.ca.com/us/securityadvisor/vulninfo/vuln.aspx?id=36838 >>> >>> Uh, did you read the link you gave? for Acrobat 9.0. There has since >>> been versions 9.1.0, 9.1.1, 9.1.2, 9.1.3, and finally of recent 9.2.0 >>> That's typical of a new version of any software. >>> >> >> http://www.us-cert.gov/cas/techalerts/TA09-286B.html >> http://www.adobe.com/support/security/bulletins/apsb09-15.html > > I've updated to 9.2 unlike some people I update software the minute an > update is available. >
Sorry. I commented on the wrong post. This was meant for your comment that stated: "Sure Acrobat had their problems, even with Java script, but not currently.". As you can see from the date of the above, Adobe have indeed had problems with javascript "currently". _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
