On 3/11/2010 12:23 PM, cmcadams wrote: > Mark Hansen wrote: >> On 3/11/2010 11:08 AM, cmcadams wrote: >>> Mark Hansen wrote: >>>> On 3/11/2010 12:17 AM, cmcadams wrote: >>>>> >>>>> According to the received, or at least frequently expressed, wisdom, >>>>> hereabouts, >>>>> having SM1 and SM2 installed simultaneously may not be wise. :/ >>>> >>>> You can have both installed at the same time. You just need to take >>>> special steps if you want to run both at the same time. >>> >>> I'd be glad to know those steps, if you have a link. >> >> There is a command-line argument which you can pass to SM 2.X, named >> I think: -no-remote, which will allow SM 2.x to launch even though >> SM 1.1.X is currently running. >> > > Thanks. I think the issue in many of the comments I've read, though, is that > of > versions possibly stepping on each others' resources.
They each have their own profile, so there is nothing for each other to step on. Do you have any evidence otherwise? _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
