cmcadams wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 12:23 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 11:08 AM, cmcadams wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 12:17 AM, cmcadams wrote:
According to the received, or at least frequently expressed,
wisdom, hereabouts,
having SM1 and SM2 installed simultaneously may not be wise. :/
You can have both installed at the same time. You just need to take
special steps if you want to run both at the same time.
I'd be glad to know those steps, if you have a link.
There is a command-line argument which you can pass to SM 2.X, named
I think: -no-remote, which will allow SM 2.x to launch even though
SM 1.1.X is currently running.
Thanks. I think the issue in many of the comments I've read, though,
is that of
versions possibly stepping on each others' resources.
They each have their own profile, so there is nothing for each other to
step on. Do you have any evidence otherwise?
Read replies to other messages of mine. Simple assertions that it is
'bad' to install multiple versions. No direct evidence, since I've never
even tried to install two versions at the same time.
Off the top of my head, the only provision I would make would be for you
to set your non-prime mail agent to download the e-mail but, also to
leave the e-mails on the server for your prime mail agent to download.
This way, you have at least one profile with all your mail on it.
Edit->Mail&Newsgroup Account Settings, select Server Settings on your
mail account and, near the bottom is "Leave messages on server for" then
select either 7 days or "until I delete them".
HTH
Daniel
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
