Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 12:23 PM, cmcadams wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 11:08 AM, cmcadams wrote:
Mark Hansen wrote:
On 3/11/2010 12:17 AM, cmcadams wrote:
According to the received, or at least frequently expressed, wisdom, hereabouts,
having SM1 and SM2 installed simultaneously may not be wise. :/
You can have both installed at the same time. You just need to take
special steps if you want to run both at the same time.
I'd be glad to know those steps, if you have a link.
There is a command-line argument which you can pass to SM 2.X, named
I think: -no-remote, which will allow SM 2.x to launch even though
SM 1.1.X is currently running.
Thanks. I think the issue in many of the comments I've read, though, is that of
versions possibly stepping on each others' resources.
They each have their own profile, so there is nothing for each other to
step on. Do you have any evidence otherwise?
Read replies to other messages of mine. Simple assertions that it is 'bad' to install
multiple versions. No direct evidence, since I've never even tried to install two
versions at the same time.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
