On 04/09/2010 05:05 PM, JD wrote: > Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote: >> JD wrote: >> >>> NoOp wrote: >>>> On 04/09/2010 06:24 AM, JD wrote: >>>>> A web page that I trust appears to have let it's security >>>>> certificate expire and now I can't sign on. There window that pops >>>>> up says: >>>>> >>>>> www.changed-webpage-name.com uses an invalid security certificate. >>>> >>>> That's also not a valid/working registered domain name either. >>>> >>> >>> Mr Paranoia here munged the e-mail address. 8-) >> >> Mr Paranoia needs to hear about www.example.com (.net) (.org) >> which are reserved for this kind of purpose. 8-) >> > > But those are not "valid/working registered domain names either" 8-) > > I really thought "changed-webpage-name" was pretty clever. I'll go back > to lurking now.
Perhaps in the future you might just give the actual url. That way you won't wast folks time. While we are on certs; this might be of interest to others: <http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=6016&tag=nl.e589> <http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2010/04/06/removing-the-rsa-security-1024-v3-root/> <http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=6016&tag=nl.e589> _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
