On 4/25/10 4:08 PM, Rufus wrote:
> »Q« wrote:
>> In <news:[email protected]>,
>> Rufus <[email protected]> wrote:
>>
>>> Once a hacker has your bookmarks file and the file containing your 
>>> passwords, you're open to any sort of ID theft permissible by that 
>>> combination.  Your browser information is one of the best targets for
>>> a hacker to exploit...so being able to just wipe the Master
>>> encryption key and be able to still access that information is about
>>> the next best thing to no protection at all...
>>>
>>> I certainly hope that isn't the case, and is why SM wipes all
>>> passwords out on a Master reset.
>>
>> It *is* the case, which is the point.  Users have the option of using
>> no master password protection at all, anyway.
>>
>> Setting the master password to the empty string is a workaround for a
>> specific problem the OP has.  The OP doesn't want to use a master
>> password in the first place, so using the empty string as the password
>> won't decrease the OP's security.
>>
> 
> Maybe, but I'm very surprised a user would be able do that without still 
> wiping out his password list - simply changing the Master to a null 
> string once it has been set is still a change; I question if that will 
> actually work...and quite hope it doesn't work, really...for all of the 
> reasons above.
> 

Another example of trying to over-protect experienced users.

-- 
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Go to Mozdev at <http://www.mozdev.org/> for quick access to
extensions for Firefox, Thunderbird, SeaMonkey, and other
Mozilla-related applications.  You can access Mozdev much
more quickly than you can Mozilla Add-Ons.
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey

Reply via email to