In <news:[email protected]>, "J. Weaver Jr." <[email protected]> wrote:
> »Q« wrote: > > In<news:[email protected]>, > > "Cruz, Jaime"<[email protected]> wrote: > > > > [about not remembering passwords on some sites. > >> I think if the banks are the ones that forced this change on > >> Mozilla, the proper response SHOULD have been to tell them to go > >> pound sand and write their own damned browser and leave the > >> Mozilla team free to write the browser the USERS want... > > > > That sounds pretty good in principle, but the banks would have just > > used browser sniffing to block all Mozilla browsers. Then Mozilla > > users couldn't use the browser for banking whether they were > > willing to type the password in or not. > > ...and then we'd just "NOT Firefox/3.6" UA spoof, the way many of us > have to do _now_ to get our stupid bank to recognize SM. -JW Wouldn't help in that case. You'd have to spoof IE's U-A string, or at least take out anything mentioning SeaMonkey or Firefox or Mozilla. But it's all moot; I don't see any plans for Mozilla products to start locking themselves out of banking sites that way. -- »Q« /"\ ASCII Ribbon Campaign \ / against html e-mail X <http://www.asciiribbon.org/> / \ _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
