On Sat, 25 Sep 2010 15:55:41 -0400, W3BNR wrote: > On 9/25/2010 11:25 AM Robert Kaiser wrote: >> Bill Davidsen schrieb: >>> Robert, I agree with the "should never break" part, but in practice >>> 2.0.7 had major issue for some people and worked poorly or not at all. >> >> I didn't have any issue with add-ons, and that is the topic here. The >> other one was unfortunate and most of those were an older failure >> existing for multiple version that was just uncovered by a mostly >> unrelated change. >> >>> Changes to SM break add-ons from other sites, >>> which were installed to fix a perceived problem in many cases. >> >> I haven't heard stories of any 2.0.x updates breaking any add-ons that >> were marked compatible with 2.0.*, independent of what site they are from. > > 'Display Mail User Agent' version 1.6.6 does not work with SM 2.0.9pre. > I think it quit working around SM 2.0.7 although it is listed as working > with SM 2.0.x. (see: > https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/thunderbird/addon/562/ > > Version 1.6.5 of Display Mail User Agent continues to work.
"This last version (1.6.6) doesn´t work with Thunderbird/2.0.0.24 - Build ID: 2010022820 I´ve downgraded to 1.6.5 and works. I´ve sent a mail to the developer but still no answer." So basically it was the author himself that broke his extension (by not testing it in SeaMonkey 2.0/Thunderbird 2.0) and nothing to do with SeaMonkey 2.0.9 itself. Phil -- Philip Chee <[email protected]>, <[email protected]> http://flashblock.mozdev.org/ http://xsidebar.mozdev.org Guard us from the she-wolf and the wolf, and guard us from the thief, oh Night, and so be good for us to pass. _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
