Bill Davidsen schrieb:
Robert Kaiser wrote:
Bill Davidsen schrieb:
From my testing of 2.1 I would say that a clear spec of how to write
conforming extensions, possibly with some trivial example, is desirable.
Feel free to write one up, we are an open community. We are trying to
write up and maintain documents about the major changes, but we are
simply unable to document every single change, and we have to create the
actual application with a very small team first, else there simply isn't
anything to document.
I'm not talking about a change log, I'm talking about documenting the
API.
Me as well. And the API for add-ons is basically the whole application.
That's both a blessing and a course, of course - on one hand you can
hook into _anything_ in the whole application with add-ons and have the
most freedom there you could ever have, on the other, it's imply
impossible to write documentation that is readable and covers all that.
In other words: The code is the only documentation that can really cover
everything.
Robert Kaiser
--
Note that any statements of mine - no matter how passionate - are never
meant to be offensive but very often as food for thought or possible
arguments that we as a community needs answers to. And most of the time,
I even appreciate irony and fun! :)
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
