NoOp wrote:
On 04/12/2011 08:49 PM, PhillipJones wrote:
Viliam Kubis wrote:
... the only thing holding me back from switching to SeaMonkey. Any
plans to implement it in the future? Please? :)
Also see this topic, started by me, navigaring to chrome URL works good
but is unstable, maybe only little modifications are needed to make it
fully operational?
http://forums.mozillazine.org/viewtopic.php?f=40&t=2138153
I'd like to hear some technical / practical implementation details about
this, thank you.
Best Regards
Viliam Kubis
No! No! No! No!
It bad enough to deal with tabs in web Browser. We don't need such
silliness in email.
Says the anti-tabs curmudgeon...
Yes I am the anti-Tab curmudgeon. . I believe tabs in mail and browsers
is just some silliness foisted upon us by a few who like to see gee
whiz bang stuff that looks good. But it complicates code and makes
application run slower. I'll be such, to the point I am no longer able
to get on computer. Applications we have had in Past worked a lot faster.
The last version of SM 1 and all of the current 2.0 series, I have been
having problems with loading pages in the browser section. Often timing
out. Having, hit reload several Times. My equipment hasn't changed
except, I've replaced every few months, And I've actually got a faster
Computer.
I can tell you I have SM, FF, FF 4, Camino, Safari, Opera, OmniWeb,
iCab, Chrome. and I only have problems with web Pages on SM, FF, And
Camino Omniweb, and Opera, I can although capable of tabs, I have set
for windows instead of Tabs and same page load almost instantly.
I honestly believe the slowdown is caused by all the gee whiz bang fancy
new stuff, tabs included. Even chrome which is tab only based is slower.
--
Phillip M. Jones, C.E.T. "If it's Fixed, Don't Break it"
http://www.phillipmjones.net mailto:[email protected]
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
