Chris Ilias wrote:
On 11-06-03 4:48 AM, Ray_Net wrote:
Neil Winchurst wrote:..
I feel that I would be quite happy to stay where I am. If it ain't broke
I suspect we have all felt the same as you do at one time another :-)
If you have decide to use SM instead of IE, you should know that with SM
you always must change,upgrade, etc .... there is no "stable release"
Actually, I find the seemingly CONSTANT IE "upgrades" quite annoying,
and i am glad that SM deVelopers have chosen the path they have.
IE updates are distributed via Windows Update.
And every SeaMonkey version is stable. :-)
Yes, in the sense that it doesn't crash. But users should realize that
the software and hardware environment changes (new Flash, OS security fixes..)
frequently, all too frequently, require new versions.
Your post is a good example of why some developers want to do automatic
updates in the background and not market every update with a version
number.
Perhaps the top level goals of the ongoing project could be articulated
to 'whet the appetite." ?
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
