Bill Davidsen wrote:
MCBastos wrote:
Interviewed by CNN on 05/08/2011 11:17, Bill Davidsen told the world:
Some commercial users have complained that they can't do a QA cycle
that often,
and according to the reports were told that Firefox is not suitable
for business
use. I can dig out the link for anyone who hasn't learned to use a
search
engine, I saw it in either networkworld.com or slashdot.
This guy at Ars Technica had a different spin on the issue:
http://arstechnica.com/business/news/2011/06/firefox-update-policy-the-enterprise-is-wrong-not-mozilla.ars/
Yes, he certainly makes the point that if you aren't the one paying for
testing, or for the cost of retraining users, or lost productivity if
there is a bug and something required stops working. And since there are
no bugfix releases if there are bugs they will never be fixed, you just
have to live with the bug for six weeks and then upgrade again.
I live with certains bugs for 7 years .....
_______________________________________________
support-seamonkey mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
