On Aug 5, 3:17 am, "Justin Wood (Callek)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>> Okay, I just got home after a week away and see there is another new > >>> version of SM. I am still on 2.0.14 and didn't update to 2.2 because of > >>> all the complaints. Now we have 2.3 and more complaints. I really don't > >>> know what to do. I like the version I am using. I am using Windows 7 > >>> which seems to complicate all new program updates. > > >>> Just wondering how others using Win 7 have managed with the new update. > > >> My largest point is that 2.2 has MUCH better windows 7 support than any > >> earlier version. SeaMonkey 2.0 had no win7 support at all. > > > No support? What are you talking about? I had no problems with SM2.x on > > my 64-bit W7 HPE machine since December 2009. > > No support is different than, "miraculously you are not noticing any > issues". Oh. > >> Also these security issues can cause many other problems, malware, > >> viruses, data integrity, among other things. Security is not a joke. > > > Which possible security issues with the current v2.0.14? > > We're working on getting newer Thunderbird and SeaMonkey lists, but see > the "and newer" and 3.6 versions of Firefox > athttp://www.mozilla.org/security/known-vulnerabilities/for starters. Thanks. Please kindly let us know when the lists are posted. :) _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
