Interviewed by CNN on 27/09/2011 20:33, Henry told the world: > Will all sites now recognize this browser? For example Comcast.net which > doesn't list Seamonkey as one it supports.
Recent versions of Seamonkey (2.1 and above) "advertise" the fact that they use the same rendering engine as Firefox, and most sites treat them as Firefox. (This behavior can be turned off if you wish) > Can I go from Mozilla 1.7 to Seamonkey 2.4 directly? Not recommended, no. There were just too many changes in the way, and there's no supported migration path for that. The shortest path would be the one Callek mentioned: SM 1.1, SM 2.0 and then SM 2.4. That is, two intermediate steps, three migrations in total. The first one is pretty easy and I don't remember any problems back in the time -- but both the 1.1->2.0 and 2.0->2.x migrations are a bit tricky and can have issues. Frankly, if you know how to move your e-mail archives, address book and bookmarks, it might be less trouble on the long run to begin with a clean Seamonkey profile. That way, you don't have to worry about old "baggage" being carried over. Your old extensions and themes probably wouldn't work anyway. -- MCBastos This message has been protected with the 2ROT13 algorithm. Unauthorized use will be prosecuted under the DMCA. -=-=- ... Sent from my Mars Rover. *Added by TagZilla 0.066.2 running on Seamonkey 2.4 * Get it at http://xsidebar.mozdev.org/modifiedmailnews.html#tagzilla _______________________________________________ support-seamonkey mailing list [email protected] https://lists.mozilla.org/listinfo/support-seamonkey
