On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 10:13:05AM +0100, Maximilian Mehnert wrote: > Am Mi, den 28.01.2004 schrieb Maximilian Mehnert um 15:28: > > > Having 400MB of RAM used by the node's java processes seems out of whack. > > > In fact that sounds insane. Which threadFactory is your configuration > > > file set to use? If you set it to use the YThreadFactory, do things > > > improve? > > Sorry. Being online for about 12 hours freenet again succeeded in > overloading an "acceptable" machine (1.5GHz, 512MB Ram), leaving it > doing nothing but swapping RAM. > > I think it's time to take a break. Perhaps I'll check back in a year ;-) > > I'm still of the opinion that freenet will only spread if people are > able to run it on a small router or in background with no noticeable > impact on performance.
Only _REAL_ geeks will do this. Freenet will spread if it can unobtrusively run on a windoze PC, only needing to be turned off for Quake III. > > If I had a second life I would help redoing the whole thing in ocaml or > something like that. But I have the miserable feeling that studying > medicine will keep me busy for the next years. :-( Ok, no more flame > wars ;-) :) It is possible to compile java to native code, that may help CPU-wise. Memory-wise, progress needs to be made, but the important thing at the moment is to get rate limiting working properly. > > Regards, > > Max > -- > Maximilian Mehnert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- Matthew J Toseland - [EMAIL PROTECTED] Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ Support mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support Unsubscribe at http://dodo.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support Or mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
