On 8/25/06, urza9814 at gmail.com <urza9814 at gmail.com> wrote:
> True, but the opennet isn't illegal.
> I'm not in any way saying the darknet shouldn't be added...it's a
> great feature...but freenet has always been an opennet, and that
> should be done first. People who want a darknet are probably already
> using other programs like Waste. If they start thinking about making
> the opennet form of freenet illegal, we'll know long before it
> happens. And there will be plenty of people (EFF, ACLU, etc) fighting
> it. I realize there are other countries where they can't use an
> opennet, but like I said, there are other darknet programs out there.
> That's not what freenet is.

Waste doesn't scale nearly as well as freenet 0.7 so there is a reason
to do it. Besides, if we don't get a darknet it'll all be a wasted
effort in a few years when they outlaw freenet for some reason which I
believe will happen and I'd be surprised if it take more than 5 more
years.

>
> On 8/24/06, Lars Juel Nielsen <lars.j.nielsen at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 8/24/06, urza9814 at gmail.com <urza9814 at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > "As I see it 0.7 relies on a bunch of people hooking up by sharing node
> > > information. I may be a part of a freenet 0.7 network that consists of 
> > > less
> > > than 20 people. Out there somewhere else is another group of people, but
> > > that group might be 100 people. Unless someone in the 2 groups makes a
> > > connection, shares node information, the 2 groups don't talk to each 
> > > other.
> > > Making matters worse, the only connection they have is through that one
> > > shared connection. There is no redundancy. Am I wrong in this assumption?"
> > >
> > > Yup...pretty much. That's why so many people refuse to switch to 0.7
> > > until there's a working opennet. I'm one of them. With an opennet, you
> > > connect to anyone who's online, with multiple connections. Don't have
> > > to trade references and you get a lot more connections with no effort.
> >
> > What will you do when freenet is made illegal and all the nodes are
> > being harvested and blocked by a national firewall? Then the whole
> > network fall apart, this can not happen with a darknet if it's done
> > right. To take down a darknet you have to find participants and trick
> > them to letting you in and then you can start finding out which hosts
> > are part of it.
> >
> > It's a lot easier, cheaper and faster to take down an opennet than a 
> > darknet.
> >
> > > Not totally sure about the 'if the one node linking them dies you lose
> > > all that data' part...seems like that's how it'd be handled, but I
> > > haven't looked into 0.7 too much...because it has no opennet, so I
> > > have no use for it.
> > >
> > > On 8/24/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com <diddler4u at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > What about a pipe to the 0.5 freenet from 0.7 that allows access to the
> > > > data? A 1-way street. 0.7 can add  data to the 0.7 freenet, but can and 
> > > > to
> > > > the 0.5 freenet. Only access the data. From what I have gathered,
> > > > 'inserting' data into freenet is not a quick task.
> > > >
> > > > As I see it 0.7 relies on a bunch of people hooking up by sharing node
> > > > information. I may be a part of a freenet 0.7 network that consists of 
> > > > less
> > > > than 20 people. Out there somewhere else is another group of people, but
> > > > that group might be 100 people. Unless someone in the 2 groups makes a
> > > > connection, shares node information, the 2 groups don't talk to each 
> > > > other.
> > > > Making matters worse, the only connection they have is through that one
> > > > shared connection. There is no redundancy. Am I wrong in this 
> > > > assumption?
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > >From: urza9814 at gmail.com
> > > > >Reply-To: support at freenetproject.org
> > > > >To: support at freenetproject.org
> > > > >Subject: Re: [freenet-support] Freenet 0,5 and 0,7
> > > > >Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 15:01:46 -0400
> > > > >
> > > > >Freenet 0.5 is an opennet. You connect to any random node that happens
> > > > >to be on. Freenet 0.7 doesn't have this yet. In 0.7, there is no main
> > > > >network. There might be now, but the idea of the way it currently is
> > > > >setup is to allow small groups to connect without connecting to
> > > > >everyone else. Pretty much, there's nowhere for the content to go.
> > > > >It'd be like trying to move everything on the internet to your local
> > > > >LAN.
> > > > >That, and it's just a complete program re-write I believe. It's quite
> > > > >easy to 'convert' the content...open a page, save it, and then
> > > > >re-upload it. The data stores work differently, and anyways the data
> > > > >is distributed, so there wouldn't be any easy way to move it over.
> > > > >
> > > > >On 8/24/06, diddler4u at hotmail.com <diddler4u at hotmail.com> wrote:
> > > > >>I've got a question for the developers.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>First a couple of comments.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>I've been watching the thread 0.5 vs 0.7, and although you want to 
> > > > >>move it
> > > > >>somewhere else I welcome it.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>I brought up 0.7 about 5 days ago. It's been running ever since, I 
> > > > >>think.
> > > > >>I
> > > > >>don't monitor the PC that it is on, but I do see activity on the 
> > > > >>router
> > > > >>port
> > > > >>for the PC. I didn't much like the idea of asking people to let me 
> > > > >>access
> > > > >>Freenet through them, but I did. I still think that is a good idea to 
> > > > >>gain
> > > > >>initial access to Freenet, but after that it should go find other 
> > > > >>nodes
> > > > >>and
> > > > >>establish connections to them. I shouldn't have to always rely on the 
> > > > >>ones
> > > > >>that were on IRC chat at the time I decided to set up the application.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>That said, here is by question.
> > > > >>
> > > > >> >From what I've seen here, there is a huge base of Freenet users on 
> > > > >> >0.5,
> > > > >>and
> > > > >>a large amount of content. What I fail to understand is why going to
> > > > >>version
> > > > >>0.7 all of that userbase and content was dropped. Why there was no 
> > > > >>way to
> > > > >>connect to that Freenet and have access to the users and the content. 
> > > > >>I've
> > > > >>tried to think of an example of some other internet application that 
> > > > >>made
> > > > >>such a radical change that the entire existing base was dropped, and 
> > > > >>quite
> > > > >>frankly I can't come up with one. I've seen application for my PC 
> > > > >>change
> > > > >>so
> > > > >>radically the data from the old application had to be converted 
> > > > >>before it
> > > > >>would work, but a migration path was always provided. Developers, why 
> > > > >>did
> > > > >>you do that?
> > > > >>
> > > > >>I'm new to the Freenet community, and I find it incredulous that 
> > > > >>years of
> > > > >>effort involved with building the Freenet community was abandoned
> > > > >>completely. What you have created is a 0.5 and a 0.7 Freenet; both 
> > > > >>will
> > > > >>exist into the future. Just as many security conscious people quit
> > > > >>upgrading
> > > > >>PGP after 6.52 because source code was no longer readily available, 
> > > > >>many
> > > > >>people will quit upgrading Freenet after 0.5. The difference is with 
> > > > >>PGP a
> > > > >>file encrypted with 6.52 can be read by the newer versions. Freenet 
> > > > >>has
> > > > >>isolated all of it's previous userbase and content.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>There is a saying, "Throwing out the baby with the bath water." You 
> > > > >>have
> > > > >>done just that.
> > > > >>
> > > > >>_________________________________________________________________
> > > > >>Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's 
> > > > >>FREE!
> > > > >>http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> > > > >>
> > > > >>_______________________________________________
> > > > >>Support mailing list
> > > > >>Support at freenetproject.org
> > > > >>http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > > > >>Unsubscribe at
> > > > >>http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > > > >>Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> > > > >>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >--
> > > > ><HTML>
> > > > ><a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&id=0&t=57";><img
> > > > >border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!"
> > > > >src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif"/></a>
> > > > >_______________________________________________
> > > > >Support mailing list
> > > > >Support at freenetproject.org
> > > > >http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > > > >Unsubscribe at
> > > > >http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > > > >Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> > > >
> > > > _________________________________________________________________
> > > > Express yourself instantly with MSN Messenger! Download today it's FREE!
> > > > http://messenger.msn.click-url.com/go/onm00200471ave/direct/01/
> > > >
> > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > Support mailing list
> > > > Support at freenetproject.org
> > > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > > > Unsubscribe at 
> > > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> > > --
> > > <HTML>
> > > <a 
> > > href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&amp;id=0&amp;t=57";><img
> > > border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!"
> > > src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif"/></a>
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Support mailing list
> > > Support at freenetproject.org
> > > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > > Unsubscribe at 
> > > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> > >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Support mailing list
> > Support at freenetproject.org
> > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> > Unsubscribe at 
> > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
> >
>
>
> --
> <HTML>
> <a href="http://www.spreadfirefox.com/?q=affiliates&amp;id=0&amp;t=57";><img
> border="0" alt="Get Firefox!" title="Get Firefox!"
> src="http://sfx-images.mozilla.org/affiliates/Buttons/180x60/blank.gif"/></a>
> _______________________________________________
> Support mailing list
> Support at freenetproject.org
> http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support
> Unsubscribe at http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support
> Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe
>

Reply via email to