On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:01:06 +0100, you wrote:
>
> Freenet 0.5 had opennet, and yet it was a failure.
>

Ok, I gotta know this.  How is 0.5 considered a failure. I use it daily and
it works flawlessly, Frost messages flow as well as ever, as do downloads of
splitfiles.  Yesterday I retrieved a freesite that had not been updated in
two years and it was 100% intact.  To me, that spells success.

"And now back to Frost"

> On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:44:42PM -0000, Hartmut Folter wrote:
> > Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet
> > failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of alpha
> > with open-net.
> --
> Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org
> Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/
> ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so.


Crash Override at OjOMetJJ+IpWf92awrR+leXmIaY



Reply via email to