It wasn't safe enough, though, I suppose.
On 30 Aug 2006 03:27:04 -0000, Crash at remailer-debian.panta-rhei.eu.org < Crash at remailer-debian.panta-rhei.eu.org> wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Aug 2006 22:01:06 +0100, you wrote: > > > > Freenet 0.5 had opennet, and yet it was a failure. > > > > Ok, I gotta know this. How is 0.5 considered a failure. I use it daily > and > it works flawlessly, Frost messages flow as well as ever, as do downloads > of > splitfiles. Yesterday I retrieved a freesite that had not been updated in > two years and it was 100% intact. To me, that spells success. > > "And now back to Frost" > > > On Mon, Aug 28, 2006 at 08:44:42PM -0000, Hartmut Folter wrote: > > > Freenet 0.7 is nothing more than yet another in a series of Freenet > > > failures-in-waiting until it proves itself, IMHO, by emerging out of > alpha > > > with open-net. > > -- > > Matthew J Toseland - toad at amphibian.dyndns.org > > Freenet Project Official Codemonkey - http://freenetproject.org/ > > ICTHUS - Nothing is impossible. Our Boss says so. > > > Crash Override at OjOMetJJ+IpWf92awrR+leXmIaY > > > _______________________________________________ > Support mailing list > Support at freenetproject.org > http://news.gmane.org/gmane.network.freenet.support > Unsubscribe at > http://emu.freenetproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/support > Or mailto:support-request at freenetproject.org?subject=unsubscribe > -------------- next part -------------- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <https://emu.freenetproject.org/pipermail/support/attachments/20060830/bbfa2328/attachment.html>
