> > Semiotic frameworks such as that of Charles Peirce indicate that > references > (or signs) work in different ways. For example, mono reverb acts as an > "icon" (that is, it is similar to) the experience of large spaces. Whereas > the recording of hair clippers acts as an "index" of close proximity (that > is, it follows that, when you hear hair clippers, they will be close to > you). > Mmmm, sounds plausible on first read, but on reflection: The recording of hair clippers acts as an 'icon' for (that is, it is similar to) the experience of close proximity (indeed a sound one only hears at close proximity). Whereas mono reverb acts as an 'index' of large spaces (that is, ...). ??
Michael _______________________________________________ Sursound mailing list Sursound@music.vt.edu https://mail.music.vt.edu/mailman/listinfo/sursound
