Randy Goldenberg wrote:
>> Thing is, not only changing one at a time, but what if it's a combination
>> of settings? I'm no mathematician, but I know how quickly the possiblities
>> add up!
>
>That's true. Trying them one at a time wouldn't take all
>that much time though, (turn on the radio :) ), and who knows, it
>might be that simple.
Yeah, you might get lucky and the 31st attempt succeeds ;)
But seriously it shouldn't be that many attempts before you locate the
correct settings (says someone that never have tried, but mathematical
speaking it's true - of course with a little bit of bad luck it might take
all the diffrent ways you can think of before it works).
Besides, take 10% a day or so, and soon you'll be finished :)
>> I am going to save your post, but truth be told, it looks like complex
>> greek to me at this point.
I found it very interesting as well Randy, can we base an entry in the FAQ
on it? (so we finally have something in the FAQ <g>)
>Debug is a fun toy. (When you've had enough of it, just hit
>"q" to quit.) DOS manuals usually include some info on how
>to use it - there are online tutorials as well. Peter Norton's
>"Inside the PC" is a great resource too, and most libraries
>seem to have it.
Wouldn't it be good if one automated the process atleast a little bit?
You always do the following:
C:\DOS>DEBUG
-D 40:0
So, do like this:
echo D 40:0 > c:\dos\modem.ans
echo q >> c:\dos\modem.ans
and add this line to you autoexec.bat:
c:\dos\debug < modem.ans
//Bernie
http://hem1.passagen.se/bernie/index.htm DOS programs, Star Wars ...
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
