In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
> Correct. I dropped developing EPPPD 0.7 since LSPPP is so much better
> (especially after giving them the source to EPPPD 0.6). There are perhaps
> other packetdrivers that are still developed, but none for modems AFAIK.
How far did you get with DOSPPPD ?
I picked up the source, but since I've had no trouble with DOSPPPD it's
just sitting there awaiting motivation and inspiration.
What changes does 0.7 have from 0.6 ?
In what way is LSppp better than DOSPPPD ? It, for the moment, lacks
DOSPPPD's diagnostics and packet stats. In addition, in my tests, it's
slower, mainly because I don't think it runs over 57600 even though
115200 is accepted. So far as I can see, it's only real current gain is
it's size, but since I can load DOSPPPD high that's not a factor for
me.
At the moment, I think DOSPPPD is still better, but LSppp is moving at
speed and DOSPPPD isn't so it's probable that state of affairs won't
last for long.
Alex.
--
____________________________ _______________________________
( Alex Venn ) ( Success has many fathers, )
(_) [EMAIL PROTECTED] (____) but failure is an orphan. (_)
To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
