"Steven C. Darnold" wrote: > Notice the elementary error concerning win31. Anybody who > went through the transition from win31 to win95 would remember > that win31 did not follow this "convention". I suspect Day's > programmer is a pimply-faced kid, whose first computer was a > Windows 95. I never went thru that transition Steven. I never used win 31, nor win 9x. Everything I wanted to do I could with dr-dos 6 until the webpages got loaded down with java that Arachne could no longer handle.
>running a 600mhz VIA C3 and a 8 gig scsi with 256meg dram. > > Another configuration blunder. To have credibility as a DOShead, > the AI should have something like a 386dx40 with copro and 8meg > RAM. Although, I must admit that the DrDOS thing is a good touch > -- you know, DrDOS is the superior DOS. My DOS is better than > your DOS. I am the DOS expert. I didnt all that for drdos, I needed it for Linux/netscape to solve the surfing problem, and to have some idea what I think most people will be using after windoz implodes. As for DR-DOS7 vs any other, look at it from the standpoint of anyone who wants to use dos or write code for it. Since it is no longer under 'development', it is a fixed format that the geek knows, that if he gets something to work, it always will. And if the user has a failure, he knows it aint the software. As for Turing, check out the Bagavad Gita. Book XVIII vs 61, where Arjuna is told the divine force is 'Causing all beings to move by the power of illusion, as if fixed on a machine. Arjuna is also told that the Divine has created and animated forms as a challenge. Whether the Avatar appears to be a fool or a sage, you cannot teach it anything (it's a cosmic robot); however, you may learn from it. To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message. Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies. More info can be found at; http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html
