On Sat, Jan 11, 2003 at 03:07:53PM +0000, Steven C. Darnold wrote:

> Howard Eisenberger wrote:
> >
> > I can use my old 486 with 8 meg ram (without X) and I
> > also have a "spare" P133. My main box is a P166.
>
> Those are all target machines for BL2.  My own computers
> range from 486-40 (8mb RAM) to P166 (64mb RAM).  Most of
> my BL testing is done on a 486-66 (16mb) -- I've got Opera
> running on it right now (on a BL1 foundation).
>
> > As far as X browsers go, right now I just use mozilla
> > or Netscape,
>
> How do they perform on the P133?

This is the machine I am planning to use for Slack 7.1 with
X. I'm not sure about Netscape, but I remember that mozilla
was pretty slow on the P133 with 32 meg ram, but version 1.0
works better with more ram (currently 96 meg).

> > I've tried at least a half dozen others in the past.
>
> Which other graphical browsers for Linux have your tried on
> the P133?  How did they perform compared to Netscape/mozilla?

Dillo, Amaya, Konqueror, Opera, and a few others that I forget.
Some may have been faster, but they didn't support as much as
mozilla or Netscape. I'd have to try them again with Slack 7.1
and perhaps cut the P133 back to 32 (or even 16) meg ram for
testing.

I'm not sure that this is something that can be decided easily.
It may be better to get more people running X in BL and then
let them experiment themselves.

Regards,

Howard E.

To unsubscribe from SURVPC send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 
unsubscribe SURVPC in the body of the message.
Also, trim this footer from any quoted replies.
More info can be found at;
http://www.softcon.com/archives/SURVPC.html

Reply via email to