Rachel Greenham [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
>
> Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > Sigh. Changing the reply-to field is a bad idea, that's why this list
> > doesn't do it anymore. There are simply better ways to take care of this,
> > one of them being a mailer that has a list-reply function, or proper use of
> > mail-followup-to.
>
> Well quite. Netscape doesn't seem to do this, but in other respects is
> the only usable mail client I've come across for Linux - which isn't
> saying much, and is quite a shock.
Well, you didn't mention Mutt, so I'll refer you to http://www.mutt.org/
As long as to you console based != always hard to use you may like what you
find. I'm by no means a console-only person but I still use Mutt for mail
because it simply has more features than the other mailers I've seen and is
really easy to learn and use. (I do personally prefer a console mailer so
I don't have to be somewhere I can run x to get my mail, but anyway...) It
makes processing large volumes of list mail and other mail pretty much
painless.
--
Jeremy Blosser | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://jblosser.firinn.org/
-----------------+-------------------------+------------------------------
"Would you fight to the death, for that which you love?
In a cause surely hopeless ...for that which you love?"
-- D. McKiernan, _Dragondoom_
PGP signature
