Jeremy Blosser wrote:
>
> Rachel Greenham [[EMAIL PROTECTED]] wrote:
> >
> > Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > Sigh. Changing the reply-to field is a bad idea, that's why this list
> > > doesn't do it anymore. There are simply better ways to take care of this,
> > > one of them being a mailer that has a list-reply function, or proper use of
> > > mail-followup-to.
> >
> > Well quite. Netscape doesn't seem to do this, but in other respects is
> > the only usable mail client I've come across for Linux - which isn't
> > saying much, and is quite a shock.
>
> Well, you didn't mention Mutt, so I'll refer you to http://www.mutt.org/
> As long as to you console based != always hard to use you may like what you
> find. I'm by no means a console-only person but I still use Mutt for mail
> because it simply has more features than the other mailers I've seen and is
> really easy to learn and use. (I do personally prefer a console mailer so
> I don't have to be somewhere I can run x to get my mail, but anyway...) It
> makes processing large volumes of list mail and other mail pretty much
> painless.
Well, I looked at Mutt before, but I really do want an X-based one. What
I *also* want is for whatever I use to use the normal unix mail folders
- Netscape with IMAP might do it but I haven't set that up yet, then, as
you say, I can use a console system remotely - and for such occasions
PINE will suffice. (More commonly I'd choose to set my X or other client
to point IMAP at my mail folders if possible...)
--
Rachel Greenham
Epinet Communications plc
-
To get out of this list, please send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with
this text in its body: unsubscribe suse-linux-e
Check out the SuSE-FAQ at http://www.suse.com/Support/Doku/FAQ/ and the
archive at http://www.suse.com/Mailinglists/suse-linux-e/index.html
