Luc,
You are right, the Christians and Muslims are probably closer. To be
honest, I did not think it trough, probably because I do not really care
and am quite tired on the whole thing. All the religious books (or
teachings) were good the past, since they functioned in a way to give a
fairly good behavioral and medical environment. Except from around 800 to
quite recent times, when the importance of keeping your soul instead of
body clean, caused quite serious and deadly periods of deceases.
Hakan
At 04:01 AM 2/4/2005, you wrote:
G'day Hakan;
----- Original Message ----- From: "Hakan Falk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 03, 2005 9:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] To Kim: {was}"Let Them Eat Rocket Fuel"John Guttridge
Luc,
I like what you say, but have only one major point to make. Christian
Zionists cannot exist, because the basic common elements of faith are not
there.
The term "christian zionist" is commonly used when refering to the
American version of so-called christians who blindly support anything the
zionists do under the false impression that it falls into line with
Scripture, and of course, the two combined is indeed an impossibility as
one's agenda is opposite from that of the other but in order to better
confuse they are termed that way.
Judas Iscariot was "called" an apostle but that didn't stop him from being
a mercenary traitor did it? Actions far outweigh rhetoric and titles, just
as those termed "christian zionist" are maybe the later but are absolutely
not the former.
Christians are those that belive that Jesus Christ, the Son of God, was
here on earth 2005 years ago, Zionists are those who still are waiting
for him to come.
I think you have "Zionists" and "Talmudists" confused, thing they have
worked very hard to obfuscate. They are not necesarily the same. Zionism
is political, Talmudism is religious.
Zionists and Muslims have more in common, than Zionists and Christians.
Other way around.Both the Bible and the Koran accept Christ as a great
prophet whereas Talmud puts Him in totally different light (figuratively
speaking, it actually has Him quite dark).When I speak Talmud I am
refering to the Babylonian Talmud Soncino Edition, not the Jerusalem
Talmud used for public consumption purposes.
It is the same God between all of them, the real problem is if Jesus was
here or not.
Actually they all acknowledge that Jesus was here, it is just that two of
them portay Him in a positive light and the other as something altogether
unmentionable in polite company.
For this difference, the children of God are prepared to kill each other,
even the ones who doesn't have a >clue of what the differences are.
Ah, yes, here also it gets muddled. "Children of God". One has it defined
in racial terms, so that would make God a racist. The other has it open to
all but a spiritual thing of the heart, often times misunderstood. The
last does not acknowledge such a thing as a posibility of existing.
Servants yes, children? No.
And then there is the game of politics that gets thrown in so that if the
waters weren't sooted already they are now to anyone trying to make heads
or tails out of the intentional mess that has been created. Kicking the
ball through the goal posts are the neo-con so-called christians denying
the very teachings they profess adhering to.
Luc
Hakan
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wwia.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/biofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Biofuel archives at Infoarchive.net (searchable):
http://infoarchive.net/sgroup/biofuel/
