<www.examiner.com/x-18425-LA-County-Nonpartisan-Examiner~y2009m9d10-Who-are-
911-Truthers-What-is-the-911-Truth-Movement>
<http://tinyurl.com/pvpjkv>
<http://tinyurl.com/r2bcob>
Hi Keith/Bruno et al,
Your points well taken, n'less the smell seems to be
growing hence the website above.
Re posting "big items": wasn't aware we suffered a space shortage. As for
the pros and cons of the issue, the title of the thread suggested the
bunfight was far from over hence my additional tuppence worth. I'm still
sitting on the fence and hoping someone, somewhere will provide a definitive
answer. I've yet to see it.
Lastly, perhaps most importantly for me, the "tinyurl" tip was much
appreesh. However, my technique probably needs some further honing as it
didn't work for me, as per examples. Will go back to the drawing board.
Regards,
Bob.
-----Original Message-----
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of
Keith Addison
Sent: Friday, 11 September 2009 7:21 a.m.
To: biofuel@sustainablelists.org
Subject: Re: [Biofuel] U. S. Head of Military Intelligence Publically States
9/11 was Staged Event
Hi Bruno
Thankyou.
>And how has this something to do with biofuel or sustainability?
:-) Who knows? "Politics" ain't sustainable, any more than
"business-as-usual" is - call it "depolitics" perhaps.
Best
Keith
>Bob,
>
>Your link is still dodgy,
>why don't you use Tiny URL or something like it?
<http://tinyurl.com/>
>
>Your link ( the http:// could have been left off to start with )
>www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.commentview&com
ment_id=158
> would then look like this, (and always work on all forums and list
servers):
<http://tinyurl.com/la7x98>
>but if you like it, it may look like this :
<http://tinyurl.com/bobs-9-11-conspiracy-theory>
>
>And imho it is always useful if you push such big items into a
>discussion group,
>even if you "truly believe" the conspiracy theory, you may simple check
first
>what skeptical debunkers of the same subject have to say;
>It may prepare you fore what opposite comments will come up;
>or even make yourself think, really think, and you may decide to not
forward
>crap to a group were you're known, and keep your reputation in good
>shape. ;-)
>
>E.G: http://www.debunking911.com/
>http://www.jod911.com/
>...
>As you'll see they have covered almost all angles, and with allot
>more then 'believes' and 'assumptions'.
>
>And how has this something to do with biofuel or sustainability?
>
>Grts
>Bruno M.
>~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>At 00:30 10/09/2009, From: "bmolloy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Keith,
>> The link on my last post was dodgy. This one works better
>>
>><http://www.worldarchitecturenews.com/index.php?fuseaction=wanappln.commen
tv
>>iew&comment_id=158
>>
>>If not, the full article is available below.
>>
>>As for facts: The discovery of nano-thermite in the WTC dust was published
>>in The Open Chemical Physics Journal in April 2009.
>>Regards,
>>Bob.
>>
>>
>>CONSPIRACY THEORY OR HIDDEN TRUTH? THE 9/11 ENIGMAS...
>>Richard Gage, AIA, Gregg Roberts, and David Chandler
>>
>>Richard Gage, AIA has been a practicing San Francisco Bay Area architect
for
>>more than 20 years, and is a registered member of the American Institute
of
>>Architects. Most recently he worked on a $400M mixed-use facility in Las
>>Vegas NV. But he is also the founder and CEO of Architects & Engineers for
>>9/11 Truth, now numbering over 800 A/Eís, calling for a new investigation
>>into the destruction of all 3 WTC high-rises on 9/11. Gage has spoken at
>>over 100 events, reaching 20 U.S. states and 8 countries. He has been
>>invited to present in 14 cities Australia, New Zealand, and Japan before
the
>>end of this year. As the anniversary of the events approaches, Gage tells
>>WAN why he thinks there are hidden depths to the destruction of the World
>>Trade Centre...
>> ...... CUT..................................
>>
>>>>>> If it doesn't start off with the preferred conclusion-of-choice
and
>>>>>> then go in search of the "facts" to "prove" it, but instead simply
>>>>> > goes in search of facts, along with all the patient and careful
>>>>>> cross-checking that takes, and then emerges with a fact-based
>>>>>> conclusion that checks out, or even with just some hard facts
without
>>>>>> a conclusion.... well then, that's different. But AFAIK it hasn't
>>>>>> happened yet, and don't hold yer breath.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Best
>>>>>>
>>> > > > Keith
>==============================================================
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000
messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
_______________________________________________
Biofuel mailing list
Biofuel@sustainablelists.org
http://sustainablelists.org/mailman/listinfo/sustainablelorgbiofuel
Biofuel at Journey to Forever:
http://journeytoforever.org/biofuel.html
Search the combined Biofuel and Biofuels-biz list archives (70,000 messages):
http://www.mail-archive.com/biofuel@sustainablelists.org/
