Since Adobe get "FLASH" we have been preparing ourselves an alternative where we use JavaScript and Only JavaScript to render SVG elements. As a mater of fact. If We can do it then anyone can do it too. Going Thu this avenue we do have full control of any event that we want. As long as IE7-8-9 ... supporting PNG and either Data:URL or Script:URL It still work fine. This may be an option for all of us to think of.
There is an demo I put at: oneplusplus.com/webproject/demosvg.asp. Note: To show that one will work on FF/IE and others browser we purposely turn of the Anti-Alias and the gradient flags off. Even they are there in the code. On 3/22/06, Lance Dyas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Jim Ley wrote: > > "Francis Hemsher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message > > news:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > >> IE7 Beta 2 Preview(3/20/2006) does not initially focus on the events > >> contained within an SVG document included in an embed. > >> It provides its own statement, via an onMouseOver popup display: "click > >> to activate and use this control". > >> > >> This lack of focus also occurs when the SVG document is panned(Alt > >> Key), thereby requiring another click to refocus the document's events. > >> > >> This not acceptable as a seamless use of the EMBED that contains an SVG > >> document on a webpage. > >> This was not a problem in IE5.5, IE6, or the previous IE7 Beta issue. > >> > > > > Talk to the US patent office, all other UA's should be following suit, > or > > paying massive licensing fees to EOLAS. > > > nah there was "real prior art" and microsoft is continuing the appeal > process... > and if Eolas knew about the prior art and kept it from the courts they > might > be on the receieving end of fines.... > > Mostly it's a stunt to annoy the patent office into pulling its finger > out > > > heheh yes software patents make no sense most methodologies in the > computer industry are mostly > common knowledge or publicly presented by scientists who wanted them to > be aknowledged and > used by everybody. The few exceptions to this the patent office probably > is not qualified to nor should be > expected to figure out. Combining those pretty much public methods in > unique complex fashions makes for > copyrightable material but not patentable. Do you patent the color blue? > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] > > > > ----- > To unsubscribe send a message to: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -or- > visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my > membership" > ---- > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > > > > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] ----- To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] -or- visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my membership" ---- Yahoo! Groups Links <*> To visit your group on the web, go to: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/ <*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to: http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
