So why are you still here?

On 26/05/2007, at 5:41 PM, Geoffrey Swenson wrote:

> SVG is probably a dead duck. I have not wanted to invest any more  
> work in it
> for more than a year. This is not to say that I dislike SVG much at  
> all, but
> the Adobe plugin has a lot of problems, and SVG is nowhere near as
> universally available as Silverlight already is. I gave up when the  
> new
> Mozilla stuff was barely functional, and Opera was even worse.  
> Since IE no
> longer handles SVG, you can continue banging your head on the wall,  
> or just
> make the pragmatic decision and go with Silverlight.
>
>
>
> Silverlight has hit the ground running hard. It isn't going to do the
> members of this group any good to put their heads in the ground and  
> hope
> that it will go away and that SVG will somehow rise from its longtime
> sickbed.
>
>
>
> There have been lots of good things to go by the wayside, such as  
> Ventura
> Publisher (which is still the best page layout program nobody has  
> heard
> about) but is probably very dead since there isn't any money to be  
> made in
> developing it any further.
>
>
>
> Microsoft has spent their millions developing Silverlight, and it  
> shows. It
> is relevant to the more honest and/or pragmatic members of this  
> group, who
> are going to have to decide how to migrate their code to something  
> that is
> going to be more widely available than SVG.
>
>
>
> I could hardly care less about whether it is open-sourced or not. I  
> just
> don't see how volunteer efforts can find a revenue stream to keep  
> up with
> proprietary code. I just want a platform for my ideas, and I will  
> pay for
> good tools.
>
>
>
> Just the rendering speed of Silverlight is something really exciting.
> Ordinary mortals can code really fast complex graphics without  
> having to
> deal with low level graphic details. If SVG could do this (and had a
> well-financed patron behind it) nobody would even care about  
> Silverlight.
>
>
>
> People here don't generally post about Flash, because we've been  
> there and
> found it seriously wanting in flexibility and programming ease.
>
>
>
> I am not a lurking Microsoft person, though I have worked there as a
> somewhat resentful permatemp a couple of times. I am perfectly  
> aware that
> Microsoft doesn't always play so nice.
>
>
>
> But Silverlight really is kewl. I am honestly very excited about it  
> and I
> will leave it at that.
>
>
>
>   _____
>
> From: [email protected] [mailto:svg- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> On Behalf Of Doug Schepers
> Sent: Friday, May 25, 2007 6:15 PM
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: [svg-developers] OT (was: Have you played with Silverlight?)
>
>
>
> Hi, Kevin and Geoff, et al-
>
> As owner of the SVG-Developers list, and as a strong supporter for  
> open
> standards, I'm going to ask you politely to stop evangelizing
> Silverlight on SVG-Dev (as I've asked for self-moderation in the past
> regarding Flash).
>
> I have nothing against Silverlight, and it's fine if you want to  
> use it,
> but it's not on-topic for our list; this is a forum for technical
> questions on using SVG. Silverlight has the weight and financial
> backing of Microsoft behind it; Flash and Apollo both have Adobe's
> backing. All these proprietary technologies have their own mailing
> lists, so I don't think they need any further advertising on this  
> list.
>
> SVG is growing steadily, and it has market relevance, but open  
> standards
> are already at a huge disadvantage compared to proprietary  
> technologies
> (and not for technical reasons). I feel that it is important that the
> Web remain open, and part of that is ensuring that no one company
> controls the languages of the Web.
>
> I'm not trying to censor this list, and I'm not going to block any
> posts. I think that a fair and open discussion of SVG will include  
> some
> comparison to competing technologies. It's important that SVG grow in
> response to other technologies (as Silverlight derives heavily from
> SVG). But it irritates me when people on this list recommend  
> abandoning
> SVG, in favor of proprietary competitors. It's FUD, and it's not  
> polite.
>
> A more constructive activity would be to identify what features of  
> those
> corporate technologies you find compelling, and ask for comparable
> features to be added to SVG on [EMAIL PROTECTED] <mailto:www-svg% 
> 40w3.org>
> (the W3C's public SVG
> list, which the SVG WG monitors for feedback). Also, you can appeal
> directly to browser vendors (or even contribute code, e.g. to Mozilla
> and Batik), and let them know you need particular SVG features (I  
> think
> that the Mozilla Corp could use some encouragement to add resources to
> SVG, for example).
>
> It's always an individual choice whether to do the Right Thing  
> (tm), or
> to let corporate interests take control (and frankly, sometimes you  
> have
> no choice, out of pragmatism); but the sum of those individual choices
> determines the landscape of the Web, and the degree to which it relies
> on open standards. Sorry if that sounds all preachy, but it's how I
> feel, and why I think SVG is more important than any similar corporate
> equivalent.
>
> If the technical difference were more pronounced, I might feel
> differently. But for most purposes, SVG is as good as its more
> tightly-controlled cousins. I think the big difference is in authoring
> tool support, and there is something that can be done about that.
>
> I'm sure you can understand my perspective, and I hope you will honor
> this request.
>
> </rant>
>
> Regards-
> -Doug
>
>
>
>
>
> [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
>
>
>
> -----
> To unsubscribe send a message to: svg-developers- 
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> -or-
> visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit  
> my membership"
> ----
> Yahoo! Groups Links
>
>
>



-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my 
membership"
---- 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to