Hi, Geoffrey-

I think you may have felt a little stung by comments on this list, but 
as I said, I have no intention of "kicking you off the list".  You are 
welcome to your opinion.  Questions or answers to SVG technical issues 
are welcome here: irrelevant boosting of Silverlight is not.


Geoffrey Swenson wrote:
> SVG is probably a dead duck. I have not wanted to invest any more work in it
> for more than a year. This is not to say that I dislike SVG much at all, but
> the Adobe plugin has a lot of problems, and SVG is nowhere near as
> universally available as Silverlight already is. I gave up when the new
> Mozilla stuff was barely functional, and Opera was even worse. Since IE no
> longer handles SVG, you can continue banging your head on the wall, or just
> make the pragmatic decision and go with Silverlight.

IE never did handle SVG, of course... the Adobe viewer did.  And the 
Renesis player (and others) are closing the gap.  SVG is alive and kicking.

You've made it clear that you don't think much of the Firefox or Opera 
implementations, but I think you're wrong.  Both are good, and both are 
improving.


> Silverlight has hit the ground running hard. It isn't going to do the
> members of this group any good to put their heads in the ground and hope
> that it will go away and that SVG will somehow rise from its longtime
> sickbed.

On the contrary.  SVG has never been more widely supported, and that 
support is improving.  And I think it does do the members of this group 
--and the Web in general-- good to support open standards, though you 
may not understand the benefits (or the dangers of the proprietary 
formats).


> Microsoft has spent their millions developing Silverlight, and it shows. 

You're right, they have... which is (again) why I don't think they need 
any more advertising on this list.


> It is relevant to the more honest and/or pragmatic members of this group, 
> who are going to have to decide how to migrate their code to something that is
> going to be more widely available than SVG.

There may be people who feel the need to, and as I said, I'm sympathetic 
to that market need...  but it's neither impragmatic nor dishonest to 
show integrity in your choice of technology.  The truth is, SVG is 
getting stronger by the day, and your opinion does nothing to change that.


> I could hardly care less about whether it is open-sourced or not. 

I said nothing about open source.  It's open standards that are 
important.  Open standards allow for cross-browser, cross-platform, 
*multi-company* interoperability.


> I just
> don't see how volunteer efforts can find a revenue stream to keep up with
> proprietary code. 

Firefox seems to have presented a good model to prove you wrong.  But 
you're confusing open source with open standards.  Open standards (HTML, 
etc.) made the Web what it is today, when all the proprietary formats 
(as championed by AOL, CompuServe, etc.) tried to keep a stranglehold on 
their own little Web territories.



> I just want a platform for my ideas, and I will pay for
> good tools.

Yes, just as I said: I think the main challenge is the tools.


> Just the rendering speed of Silverlight is something really exciting.
> Ordinary mortals can code really fast complex graphics without having to
> deal with low level graphic details. If SVG could do this (and had a
> well-financed patron behind it) nobody would even care about Silverlight.

I agree that rendering speed is something that most SVG implementations 
could use help on, and they are working on it.  As for a well-financed 
patron... well, again, I think you're dancing with the devil when you 
want one company to rule a technology.


> I am not a lurking Microsoft person, though I have worked there as a
> somewhat resentful permatemp a couple of times. I am perfectly aware that
> Microsoft doesn't always play so nice.

And yet...


> But Silverlight really is kewl. I am honestly very excited about it and I
> will leave it at that.

Great.  I expect not to hear any more from you about it on this list, 
thanks.

Regards-
-Doug


-----
To unsubscribe send a message to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-or-
visit http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers and click "edit my 
membership"
---- 
Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/svg-developers/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
    mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
 

Reply via email to