Hugh Falk wrote:
>Well, you can call it whatever you like. The IBM-compatible PC is a "PC,"
>but so is Apple and the others. So it isn't correct to only call that
brand
>a PC. If you chose to be incorrect, that's your choice.
>For example, you could incorrectly say something like this, "I was talking
>about PCs, not Apples."
Excuse me, but then you can't talk about Apples either. Apple is a fruit :)
So you'll have to say an Apple Macintosh for it to be correct too
> But anybody who knows what a PC is, might think
>that you don't. Again your choice. Just like (God forbid) if I had
cancer
>of the rectum, I wouldn't want the doctor to tell me I had colon cancer
just
>because it was a shorter or more common term (since that would be
>incorrect). I prefer to discuss both my rectum and my PCs correctly :-))).
I'm sure that if you start discussing your rectum, most people won't care
if you're doing it correctly or not! ;) ;) ;)
>Hugh
Pedro R. Quaresma
[EMAIL PROTECTED] / [EMAIL PROTECTED]
"All your base are belong to us"
http://www.salvador-caetano.pt
http://www.globalshop.pt
----------------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent to you because you are currently subscribed to
the swcollect mailing list. To unsubscribe, send mail to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of 'unsubscribe swcollect'
Archives are available at: http://www.mail-archive.com/swcollect@oldskool.org/
