----- Original Message ----
> From: Andreas Fink <[email protected]>

> > well, the Docsis 3.0 CMTS hardware is quite expensive,
> > if not saying dramatically expensive.
> 
> > Then, the Docsis provisioning software is also quite expensive,
> 
> I guess you simply bought a dead end solution. Good hardware vendors supply 
> IPv6 
> out of the box or at least with firmware upgrades. There's no reason to be 
> expensive

I haven't bought anything, I just know the Docsis technology market. 
The provisioning software is generally not v6-ready, and the 
hardware generally needs expensive upgrade.

> > in DSL market, it's even worse: the Broadband Forum has not released yet any
> > ipv6 related document...
> 
> Who cares what the broadband forum says. We're in a IP world. There's 100's 
> of 
> RFC's documenting IPv6. I personally run IPv6 natively over a SHDSL link and 
> it 
> just works. As SHDSL shares the same basic ATM structure underneath like 
> ADSL, I 
> don't see why anyone could NOT do IPv6 if he just tries hard enough. IPv6 is 
> at 
> the end not that different to IPv4. Even with PPP it should work as PPP 
> encapsulates link frames, not IP packets so you can easily stuff IPv6 packets 
> into PPP.

The fact that Andreas or Tonnere is able to configure ipv6 at home does not 
create a business case. Go look at your nearest Interdiscount or Fust shop -- 
how many of the consumer routers/firewalls/modems would support ipv6?
How many of the shop salesmen would ever hear such word?

> Who cares what the broadband forum says.

any ISP with more than few thousand xDSL customers does. You know, they are 
lazy 
enough to build something that does not have a standard supported by vendor 
majority.

Besides, even if they start offering v6 today, users will not buy it, because 
of that 
Interdiscount/Fust issue. Also most windows PCs and home servers would need 
some 
tuning for v6. 

So, give it another 4-5 years, it's coming, but not as fast as you'd like it to 
:)


> > apart from that, yes, the engineers are usually lazy :-)
> 
> Its also a management issue. in USA IPv6 is not that common simply because 
> everyone can get tons of IPv4 addresses too easy (at least in the past).
> But you gotta start sometime. And the time is now. Everyone supports IPv6 
> these 
> day and personally I would not choose a BGP4 uplink which does NOT suport 
> IPv6 
> (we actually have thrown a IPv4 provider out just recently and replace it 
> with a 
> IPv6 capable one).

it's purely an economy issue. Big ISPs will not invest into 
something that the end-users don't require on massive scale. Those home 
end-users 
who have no idea what BGP or PPP means. They just connect their computers into 
the 
wall sockets and expect them to work.

_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Antwort per Email an