Hello Ralph

> [TL;DR]  ;-)

sorry about that, but it's not about an MX to a CNAME, it's about the domain 
part being resolved
directly via a CNAME (kind of like having a domain-level CNAME to another 
domain, except _THAT_ isn't allowed
due to shadowing NS and SOA records). With something like 
"accountprotection.microsoft.com" they're probably
not breaking that rule though.

When you have time, I'd welcome an answer to my question ;)

Cheers,
Markus


_______________________________________________
swinog mailing list
swinog@lists.swinog.ch
http://lists.swinog.ch/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/swinog

Antwort per Email an