Andre Oppermann wrote: > Obeying that I think the SWINOG group should send a response to the > FMG revision targeting very specifially these points with clear > technical background:
[...] Thanks Andre, I strongly support your effort. > - Art. 4, providing a telecommunications service requires prior > registration with OFCOM We can probably live with Art. 4, although it leaves questions open. > - Art. 13a+b, OFCOM might process and give any kind of personal > data about telecommunication users to any other federal office > as well as foreight authorities. It doesn't have to obey data > protection rules. It almost seems that there is no lobby group for privacy left. People in Switzerland seem to have the "Fichen-Skandal" already forgotten. > - Art. 45a, spam article This is horrifing. ISP gets blamed for action of abuser. Anyone in contact with people from the parliament? > I will prepare a letter to OFCOM containing these statements in > the name of SWINOG and its members. Everybody who says yes will > be included with his/her name as co-signatory. I will post the > final letter (in german) here for review. October 15 is the last > date the letter has to arrive at OFCOM to be considered. > > Please say so if you agree or if you do not agree with the letter > in general or particular things in it. ACK. Thanks again, Andre. Regards Fredy ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
