> Andre Oppermann wrote: > > Obeying that I think the SWINOG group should send a response to the > > FMG revision targeting very specifially these points with clear > > technical background: > > [...]
I second... but not it comes... shouldnt we, at least, create a SwiNOG association? So we would probably have a bit more 'power' and people would perhaps listen us more seriously.. Andre? any comments? Others comments are also welcome ;-) P. ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
