Pascal Gloor wrote: >>Andre Oppermann wrote: >> > Obeying that I think the SWINOG group should send a response to the >> > FMG revision targeting very specifially these points with clear >> > technical background: > > I second... but not it comes... shouldnt we, at least, create a SwiNOG > association? So we would probably have a bit more 'power' and people would > perhaps listen us more seriously.. Andre? any comments? Others comments are > also welcome ;-)
Association would bind a lot of resources. We need a 'Vorstand', 'Statuten', a president, membership fees and so on. Any volounteers? But I agree, being an association, we'd would be mentioned in political issues regarding FMG, privacy, telecommunications and so on. Regards Fredy ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
