Hi all, I'm interested in why de-peering is seen as an appropriate response to the spamming issue. What is the desired result? What relief does this bring to the victims of the spam? Or is this only used as a way to censure the offending network?
Help me determine why I should de-peer with AS13250. ;-) Jon Martin ip-man AS20932 ----- Original Message ----- From: "Fredy Kuenzler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2004 11:50 AM Subject: Re: [swinog] Backbone Solutions is spamming again. > Fredy Kuenzler wrote: > > According to Netlantis, a direct peering over TIX is maintained of: > > > > AS4589, AS6772, AS8758, AS8833, AS12347, AS12350, AS15623, AS16215, > > AS16221, AS20932, AS21232, AS24951. > > > > Please shutdown peering with Backbone Solutions. They have been > > warned and promised not to spam again. > > Netlantis says that > > AS4589, AS6772, AS8758, AS8833, AS12347, AS12350, AS15623, AS16215, > AS20932, AS21232 > > are still peering with the spammers. > > F. > ---------------------------------------------- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: > http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/ > > ---------------------------------------------- [EMAIL PROTECTED] Maillist-Archive: http://www.mail-archive.com/swinog%40swinog.ch/
