Hi The odd/even numbering was great since then, I dont really see why this have to change. 1.1 is a developement version since a bit of time, then I put a big +1 on 1.2 version. I personally don't care about version number marketting, otherwise i'd never have used symfony 0.4 which was already great at this time. And afterall, 1.2 or 2.0, who cares? we're developpers, we do not try to by the flashiest vacuum... The most important thing to me in this topic is that BC is kept, mostly thanks to the upgrade task. imo, remaining part of the topic is mostly troll-like, and whatever next stable release of symfony will be, I will never use it for the number written on it.
Romain 2007/10/3, Stefan Koopmanschap <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > Fabien, > > Care to elaborate on the reason for abandoning this scheme? I'm quite > curious as to why this was abandoned > > Stefan > > On Oct 2, 12:24 pm, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > project.com> wrote: > > even and odd versions were used before the symfony 1.0 release. We don't > > use them anymore. > > > > Fabien > > > > Bert-Jan wrote: > > >> that point exposed by Tamcy is important. > > > > >> When talking in a business layer with other people in any project, > the > > >> linux > > >> kernel method looks good.( 2.6.20.x stable, 2.6.21.x dev( it's become > a 22 > > >> stable) ), much more with not IT people. > > > > > Not really on topic anymore but FYI: the even=stable/odd=unstable > scheme > > > has been abandoned in the kernel about 2 years ago. That's why they've > > > built quite a lot of new stuff into it but there still isn't a 2.7.x > > > branch for development. Currently, work is being done on the 2.6.23kernel > > > and when that's released it's officially a stable version. The release > > > candidates are for development and testing. > > > > >> Why? to a quick assign of status of development and a speed/activity > off > > >> dev > > >> that way can be more helpfull. > > > > >> according with first Francois post, IMHO, the next release can be > named > > >> 1.5, > > >> or better 1.9. :-D. > > > > >> but, Francois, usually major versions increases when core part of > > >> framework/project/wathever did a BC or change much things of first > > >> concepts > > >> of the framework, then I ask you, what we can define what is core > part of > > >> symfony and what is not ? > > >> this can help in that kind of questions > > > > > -- Best regards Romain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
