I think we need to stop this thread now. From what I understand from 
this thread, here is my decision:

- Next version of symfony will be 1.1 as we always said.

- 1.1 will be bundled with the sfCompat10Plugin (it contains the old 
helpers and validators, fill in filter, the 1.0 execution filter, 
phpmailer, bridges, the sfProcessCache class, ...).

- The sfCompat10Plugin won't be included in symfony 1.2

- symfony 2.0 will have a different philosophy for the controller 
implementation and won't be compatible with symfony 1.X

Fabien

Tamcy wrote:
> Then it seems ok for 1.5 or even 2.0, obviously the change to symfony
> core is much more than expected.
> Just one concern: If it is 1.5, I feel more comfortable that it keeps
> compatibility to deprecated stuff like function
> helpers, which should be dumped by 2.0. The compatibility plugin(?)
> for 1.0 should be shipped with the next
> stable version, am I correct?
> 
> 
> 
> On Oct 2, 6:24 pm, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> project.com> wrote:
>> even and odd versions were used before the symfony 1.0 release. We don't
>>   use them anymore.
>>
>> Fabien
>>
>> Bert-Jan wrote:
>>>> that point exposed by Tamcy is important.
>>>> When talking in a business layer with other people in any project, the
>>>> linux
>>>> kernel method looks good.( 2.6.20.x stable, 2.6.21.x dev( it's become a 22
>>>> stable)  ), much more with not IT people.
>>> Not really on topic anymore but FYI: the even=stable/odd=unstable scheme
>>> has been abandoned in the kernel about 2 years ago. That's why they've
>>> built quite a lot of new stuff into it but there still isn't a 2.7.x
>>> branch for development. Currently, work is being done on the 2.6.23 kernel
>>> and when that's released it's officially a stable version. The release
>>> candidates are for development and testing.
>>>> Why? to a quick assign of status of development and a speed/activity off
>>>> dev
>>>> that way can be more helpfull.
>>>> according with first Francois post, IMHO, the next release can be named
>>>> 1.5,
>>>> or better 1.9. :-D.
>>>> but, Francois, usually major versions increases when core part of
>>>> framework/project/wathever did a BC or change much things of first
>>>> concepts
>>>> of the framework, then I ask you, what we can define what is core part of
>>>> symfony and what is not ?
>>>> this can help in that kind of questions
> 
> 
> > 
> 
> 

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"symfony developers" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to