Fabien, Care to elaborate on the reason for abandoning this scheme? I'm quite curious as to why this was abandoned
Stefan On Oct 2, 12:24 pm, Fabien POTENCIER <[EMAIL PROTECTED] project.com> wrote: > even and odd versions were used before the symfony 1.0 release. We don't > use them anymore. > > Fabien > > Bert-Jan wrote: > >> that point exposed by Tamcy is important. > > >> When talking in a business layer with other people in any project, the > >> linux > >> kernel method looks good.( 2.6.20.x stable, 2.6.21.x dev( it's become a 22 > >> stable) ), much more with not IT people. > > > Not really on topic anymore but FYI: the even=stable/odd=unstable scheme > > has been abandoned in the kernel about 2 years ago. That's why they've > > built quite a lot of new stuff into it but there still isn't a 2.7.x > > branch for development. Currently, work is being done on the 2.6.23 kernel > > and when that's released it's officially a stable version. The release > > candidates are for development and testing. > > >> Why? to a quick assign of status of development and a speed/activity off > >> dev > >> that way can be more helpfull. > > >> according with first Francois post, IMHO, the next release can be named > >> 1.5, > >> or better 1.9. :-D. > > >> but, Francois, usually major versions increases when core part of > >> framework/project/wathever did a BC or change much things of first > >> concepts > >> of the framework, then I ask you, what we can define what is core part of > >> symfony and what is not ? > >> this can help in that kind of questions --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "symfony developers" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/symfony-devs?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
