On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Aaron Meurer <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Apr 9, 2012 at 11:03 PM, Ondřej Čertík <[email protected]> > wrote: >> On Fri, Mar 30, 2012 at 11:40 AM, Brian Granger <[email protected]> wrote: >>> Aaron, >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> I fully agree with this. >> >> The same here. >> >>> It takes discipline to break up a big >>> project into a set of smaller pull requests, but it is extremely >>> important. Students need to think very carefully about how they will >>> do this and describe their plan in their GSoC application. Obviously, >>> mentors will also have to be disciplined in doing code reviews and >>> helping the code to get in. >> >> My dream is to get sympy-bot and the corresponding app engine site + >> our linode.com server to automatically run tests on a pull request. >> Then merging simple small pull request should be a matter of hitting >> the green "merge button" at github. Right now one has to run sympy-bot >> by hand, which takes time. >> >> Ondrej > > If we get "sympy-bot work" working, so that the reviews site can serve > out requests to review, then we might not even need the linode server. > I plan to buy a new laptop this summer, and I can easily setup my old > one to run sympy-bot all the time. And if a single machine isn't > enough, no doubt someone else could do the same. Like I think I said > earlier, instead of running folding@home, you can run sympy-bot work > in your spare CPU cycles :)
Absolutely, this is the way to do it. Ondrej -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "sympy" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/sympy?hl=en.
