> Agree that the new protocol SHOULD include compatibility with the old > protocol for both pitch and catch (or source and sink, client and server, > heckyll and jeckyll, etc.). I think that this is one of the big problems with existing protocol. It is not very flexible and any changes have the potential to break other vendor's implementations. We considered some enhancements at BSDI, but had to abandon them in favor of backwards compatibility. Thanks. Jeff
- RE: intro... Chad Schieken
- RE: intro... Carl Friedberg
- Re: intro... Prairie Flower
- Re: intro... Douglas Granzow
- RE: intro... Chad Schieken
- Re: intro... Balazs Scheidler
- Re: intro... Chris Calabrese
- RE: intro... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: intro... d
- Re: intro... Chris Calabrese
- Re: intro... Jeffrey C Honig
- Re: intro... Ivan Arce
- Re: intro... Robert Webber
- Re: intro... Stefan Jon Silverman
- Re: intro... Andre Thomas
- Re: intro... Giles Lean
- Re: intro... Stefan Jon Silverman
- Re: intro... Balazs Scheidler
- Re: intro... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: intro... Emiliano Kargieman
- Re: intro... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
