On Tue, 19 Oct 1999 18:15:03 -0400 Robert Webber wrote: > It means that some people's implementations are going to be more complex > than other people's. But it's an implementation issue. Implementation issues should not be entirely ignored. Ease of implementation and migration will impact the adoption of a new standard. A protocol that encourages robust implementations is more likely to be reliable than one that is neutral or even discourages quality implementations, too, and reliability is important. Regards, Giles
- Re: intro... Balazs Scheidler
- Re: intro... Chris Calabrese
- RE: intro... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: intro... d
- Re: intro... Chris Calabrese
- Re: intro... Jeffrey C Honig
- Re: intro... Ivan Arce
- Re: intro... Robert Webber
- Re: intro... Stefan Jon Silverman
- Re: intro... Andre Thomas
- Re: intro... Giles Lean
- Re: intro... Stefan Jon Silverman
- Re: intro... Balazs Scheidler
- Re: intro... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: intro... Emiliano Kargieman
- Re: intro... by way of "Chris M. Lonvick" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Re: intro... Robert Webber
- Re: intro... Balazs Scheidler
