2013/7/16 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl>: > On Tue, Jul 16, 2013 at 05:08:12PM +0100, Colin Guthrie wrote:
>> I am not too concerned about unused runtime directories. After all this >> is not something that would (or even could) grow without bounds. There >> will never be more than O(n) runtime directores for n being the number >> of packages you have installed (or had installed). > Sure, but this n can be around a couple hundred I'd image when debian > is fully converted and installed. For efficiency this is probably > unmesurable, but as an admin I'd prefer not to have hundreds of empty > dirs in /run. That seems to be misconception: Even when all 1200+ packages currently shipping SysV init scripts, have native systemd support, this doesn't mean that all those 1200 packages are actually installed. I think it's even less of an issue for Debian, as we usually only install stuff when needed and not in a disabled state. I expect that a typical desktop installation has around 30 system services, and I'm pretty sure it's rather uncommon to have more then 5 disabled system services. -- Why is it that all of the instruments seeking intelligent life in the universe are pointed away from Earth? _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
