On Wed, 17.07.13 06:56, Andrey Borzenkov (arvidj...@gmail.com) wrote: > > On Tue, 16.07.13 18:53, Lennart Poettering (lenn...@poettering.net) wrote: > > > > I'd be very conservative regarding adding full tmpfiles support into > > unit files directly. Instead, I'd suggest adding two very minimal, very > > specific new unit file settings: > > > > RuntimeDirectory= > > RuntimeDirectoyMode= > > > > If RuntimeDirectory= is set we'd create it and chown() it to the UID/GID > > set with User= and Group=. We'd apply the mode specified in > > RuntimeDirectoryMode= to it. > > > > We'd even allow multiple runtime directories to be specified. > > What if different directories need different modes? I'm afraid it will > become hard to express in unit file.
All complex cases would be handled by tmpfiles as before. This is not supposed to be a 100% solution. It would be a > 70% solution though, if I look at the tmpfiles snippets I have installed on my local machine. Lennart -- Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
