On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 4:50 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbys...@in.waw.pl> wrote: > On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 02:51:09AM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote: > [snip repoquery magic] > >> This means: ~81% of the packages have been converted from sysv to >> systemd. And ~10% of the converted packages make use of tmpfiles. >> >> Now, my rpm/yum-fu is a bit too limited to easily figure out what >> precisely they use of the tmpfiles functionality. > > So, as the person who originally porposed adding tmpfiles to units, > I'm now more or less convinced that it's too late and not worth it. > Since the tmpfiles snippets have been written, and a big chunk is > done, it would be too confusing to add duplicate functionality. > People pointed out problems with the limited > RuntimeDirectory=/RuntimeDirectoryMode= proposal, and Lennart and > Kay are against the original idea to add tmpfiles snippets directly. > The unproven benefits are not worth it, and we certainly have other > things waiting on the table. So let's close this thread.
Sounds good to me. Thanks, Kay _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
