On 07/16/2013 09:28 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 07/16/2013 06:26 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote: >> I discussed this a bit more with Kay on the phone. Here's what we'd propose: >> >> I'd be very conservative regarding adding full tmpfiles support into >> unit files directly. Instead, I'd suggest adding two very minimal, very >> specific new unit file settings: >> >> RuntimeDirectory= >> RuntimeDirectoyMode= > > What exactly are we trying to solve here which should not be fixed upstream in > the daemons themselves? >
If RuntimeDirectory would support variable substitutions, this feature could not be provided with systemd-tmpfiles. _______________________________________________ systemd-devel mailing list systemd-devel@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/systemd-devel
