On Wed, Jan 22, 2014 at 11:04:38PM +0100, Tobias Knerr wrote: > On 22.01.2014 21:52, yvecai wrote: > > 97 sport=ski_jump_take_off, given the number off such facilities in the > > world can be considered as a massive use of the tag. Should we really > > change the key even if leisure, man_made or piste:type would seems more > > appropriate ? > > Yes, we should change it. This value would re-define the sport=* key, > and 97 uses are not enough to re-define a key with 645415 uses.
-1 * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe the details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility it is. Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How? * 97 is a high percentage ski jump sites that were mapped. There is no reason to compare it with unrelated sports. * sport=* is really lacking form many purposes, which is the reason that most sports that can profit from detailed mapping don't use it. We don´t mark hiking trails with sport=hiking, via ferrata's with sport=, waterways with sport=kayaking. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
