On Jan 23, 2014, at 12:35 PM, yvecai wrote: > I've checked the 8 piste:type=ski_jump mapped and a part one that is obscured > by cloud, the others are what they are: the piste on the on the ski jump > facility (I even forgot I mapped some myself from Bing). I was afraid this > tag would be already used by freestyle jumps. > > So I propose: > > * piste:type=ski_jump > for the actual ski_jump_take_off way (this is why the piste:type tag is here, > and keep it simple, no take_off, no in_run) > * man_made=ski_jump > for the facility > * piste:type=ski_jump_landing > possibly with area=yes , this would allow an orthogonal leisure= to be mapped > for summer. > What do you think ? > > Yves > +1 Sounds good to me and seems to fit the current piste:*=* usage.
Tod
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
