On Thu, Jan 23, 2014 at 01:33:41PM +0100, Janko Mihelić wrote: > 2014/1/23 Richard Z. <[email protected]> > > > * sport=* is used for something different. His intention was to describe > > the > > details of a technical structure, not to say what kind of sport facility > > it is. > > Would you map ski-pistest with sport=*? How? > > * 97 is a high percentage ski jump sites that were mapped. There is no > > reason > > to compare it with unrelated sports. > > * sport=* is really lacking form many purposes, which is the reason that > > most > > sports that can profit from detailed mapping don't use it. We don´t mark > > hiking > > trails with sport=hiking, via ferrata's with sport=, waterways with > > sport=kayaking. > > > > In all those cases sport=* is used to describe what sport can be played on > a particular physical object. Sport=hiking is put on a highway=path, > sport=kayaking is put on waterway=river.
not even mentioned in the respective pages * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Hiking * http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/Whitewater_sports Regarding cycling, is it a sport, leisure or just a mean of transportation? Some ways should be marked with all three. > Following that logic, we should have sport=ski_jumping put on a > leisure=ski_jump_hill. sport=ski_jump_take_off makes no sense, because > that's not a sport, that is a facility. I think you listed two valid points in this paragraph but I don´t see how they follow the same logic. They are just different uses for different purposes. Richard _______________________________________________ Tagging mailing list [email protected] https://lists.openstreetmap.org/listinfo/tagging
